Cases 31 - 40 of 89
SKINKLE et al v. FARDO et al
as 2:2017cv01142
Plaintiff:
RYAN SKINKLE , MICHAEL SKINKLE and AUDRA SKINKLE
Defendant:
NOAH FARDO and FLAHERTY FARDO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KIM v. VALUE ADDED INVESTMENT CORP et al
as 2:2017cv04205
Plaintiff:
WOOK KIM
Defendant:
VALUE ADDED INVESTMENT CORP, THOMAS X. FLAHERTY and BYEONG CHAN MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLAHERTY v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2017cv01178
Plaintiff:
MARY R. FLAHERTY
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In re: Thomas Flaherty
as 16-2988
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS E. FLAHERTY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Bar-B-Corp et al
as 4:2016cv00847
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Sony/ATV songs LLC d/b/a Sony/ATV Acuff Rose Music , Welsh Witch Music and others
Defendant:
Bar-B-Corp, Sharon Babb and Thomas X. Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv04444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KUCHAR v. TOWNSHIP OF METUCHEN et al
as 2:2015cv03464
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KUCHAR
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF METUCHEN , METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT , POLICE COMMISSIONER OF METUCHEN and others
Cross_claimant:
JOSEPH WENSKOSKI
Cross_defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF METUCHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
FLAHERTY v. BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01470
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. FLAHERTY
Defendant:
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC, BIOMET INC, BIOMET MANUFACTURING CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BELLE et al v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2013cv01448
Plaintiff:
PAUL BELLE , LISA BIGGS , BARBARA BISHOP and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER, UPMC, UPMC HEALTH SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
