Cases 31 - 40 of 328
Jameson Rosado v. Joseph Dickson, et al
as 22-3218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMESON ROSADO
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH A. DICKSON, Retired US Magistrate, MIKE KELLY, Carteret Police Officer, SGT. E. STENTELLA, Carteret Police Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CRAWFORD et al v. FIRST STATE DEPOSITORY COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2022mc00059
Receiver:
KELLY M. CRAWFORD
Plaintiff:
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
Defendant:
FIRST STATE DEPOSITORY COMPANY, LLC and ROBERT LEROY HIGGINS
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. First State Depository Company, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
First State Depository Company, LLC, Argent Asset Group LLC and Robert Leroy Higgins
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
GWIAZDOWSKI v. MARUCA et al
as 1:2022cv04303
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA M GWIAZDOWSKI and CHRISTINA M. GWIAZDOWSKI
Defendant:
ANTHONY R MARUCA, MICHAEL W GALLAGHER, BRENT P HIGGINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
