Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Graham v. Rawley et al
as 2:2014cv06743
Plaintiff:
Jessica C. Graham
Defendant:
Charles T. Rawley, Nancy Herrera, ERIC PETERSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEESE v. STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2014cv04905
Plaintiff:
DIANA BEESE
Defendant:
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY, JANE DOE 1-3 and XYZ CORP 1-2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAHILL et al v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv00663
Plaintiff:
JOHN CAHILL
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , FREDERICK HERRAN , OFFICER JOHN DOE (1-4) and others
Movant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAGG et al v. MALKIN et al
as 3:2013cv04899
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG, MICHAEL SIMPSON, PAUL WILKINS and others
Defendant:
STANLEY MALKIN, TORRANCE PHILLIP, PATRICIA HUNDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abney v. Younker et al
as 1:2013cv01418
Plaintiff:
Clarence Abney
Defendant:
Caleb Younker, Robert Brooks, Nathan Lehman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Lamas et al
as 1:2012cv02613
Plaintiff:
Apryle Williams
Defendant:
Marirosa Lamas, Sutton, Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Reitz et al
as 1:2012cv02045
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Brooks
Defendant:
Earl Reitz, Shenk, John/Jane Doe 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEIL v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2012cv06392
Plaintiff:
KARLENE NEIL
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTION FACILITY, ABC CORP. 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Fed Ex et al
as 1:2012cv00767
Plaintiff:
Dorcas Holmes
Defendant:
Fed Ex, Jeffrey Benedict and John/Jane Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv06947
Plaintiff:
SYKEETA SMALL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and POLICE OFFICERS JANE DOE #1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.