Cases 31 - 40 of 63
PINEDA CABALLERO v. FINGERS FACES & TOES CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv07449
Plaintiff:
ORTENCIA INES PINEDA CABALLERO
Defendant:
FINGERS FACES & TOES CORP., FINGERS TOES & NAILS CORP., MANI & PEDI SPA INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
YOUNG v. ROSE et al
as 2:2017cv04128
Plaintiff:
KEVIN YOUNG
Defendant:
ROSE and PRETTY NAILS COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cianti v. Harman International Industries Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
John Cianti
Defendant:
Harman International Industries Inc., Dinesh Paliwal, Adriane Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
SKY BEAUTY, LLC v. GLAM AND GLITS NAIL DESIGN, INC.
as 3:2016cv03729
Plaintiff:
SKY BEAUTY, LLC
Defendant:
GLAM AND GLITS NAIL DESIGN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC. v. KNK FASHION, INC.
as 2:2016cv02934
Defendant:
KNK FASHION, INC.
Plaintiff:
KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC. and KISS NAIL PRODUCTS, INC. (d/b/a Kiss Products, Inc.)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
PJSC CREDIT-MOSCOW BANK et al v. KHAIROULLINE et al
as 2:2015cv06604
Plaintiff:
PJSC CREDIT-MOSCOW BANK and ANATOLIY ANATOLYEVICH BELOSHCHIN
Defendant:
NAIL KHAIROULLINE and RUSHANA KHAIROULLINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHEN v. DIANA ORIENTAL NAILS LLC et al
as 1:2015cv05037
Plaintiff:
HUA ZHU CHEN
Defendant:
DIANA ORIENTAL NAILS LLC , DIANA TRAM and JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES #1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HUI v. VAN NAILS AND HAIR et al
as 2:2015cv02741
Plaintiff:
WU MIN HUI
Defendant:
VAN NAILS AND HAIR , EDISON VAN HA, VAN THU CALV and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Certain Underwriters of Lloyds v. Johnny Le d/b/a Nails Time
as 14-3141
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS OF LLOYDS OF LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. CPS200601660
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHNNY LE D/B/A NAILS TIME
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
