Cases 31 - 39 of 39
In re: Jonathan Jone
as 11-3389
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant - Respondent:
DA ALLEGHENY COUNTY
CHEVRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC et al v. FERRA et al
as 2:2010cv00671
Plaintiff:
CHEVRON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LLC and CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
Defendant:
FRANK JAMES FERRA and PAUL JONES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv04446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
JONES et al v. ARMSTRONG WOLRD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv79559
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES, PAUL JONES, ALENE JONES and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WOLRD INDUSTRIES, INC., GAF CORP., KEENE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jones v. Shannon, et al
as 08-4838
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SHANNON, Counselor, ATTY GEN PA and DA ADAMS
ARISTA RECORDS LLC. et al
as 2:2008cv01325
Plaintiff:
ARISTA RECORDS LLC., ZOMBA RECORDING LLC., UMG RECORDINGS, INC. and others
Defendant:
PAUL JONES, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JONES v. SHANNON et al
as 2:2008cv01266
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PAUL JONES
Respondent:
R. SHANNON, THOM CORBETT and ZAPPALA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones v. Williamson
as 1:2007cv00885
Petitioner:
Paul Jones
Respondent:
Troy Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. MARIN
as 2:2007cv00738
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES
Defendant:
LUIS MARIN, ANTHONY LAHANIS, DERREC JONES and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
LUIS MARIN, ANTHONY LAHANIS, LUIS MARIN and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
DERREC JONES, Walter Leasing, Walter Brokerage and others
Counter Claimant:
LUIS MARIN, ANTHONY LAHANIS, LUIS MARIN and others
Counter Defendant:
PAUL JONES and PAUL JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
