Cases 31 - 40 of 209
WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Respondent:
Superintendent BARRY R. SMITH, JOHN E. WETZEL, COUNSELOR GINTER and others
Petitioner:
JAMES H. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. SMITH et al
as 1:2020cv09120
Plaintiff:
DENISE R. SMITH
Defendant:
PHILLIP D. MURPHY, CHIEF OF POLICE CHRISTOPHER CHEW, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v. MERCK & CO. INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01739
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO. INC.
Plaintiff:
DONEVON SMITH and MARGARET R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baxter v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00522
Petitioner:
Justin Baxter
Respondent:
Barry R. Smith and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
STAGNER v. SMITH
as 2:2020cv00372
Plaintiff:
STAGNER
Defendant:
SMITH
Petitioner:
JOHN T. STAGNER
Respondent:
Superintendent BARRY R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RANSOME v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv01224
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, BARRY R. SMITH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JERRY RANSOME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCOY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv00949
Plaintiff:
MARLIN MCCOY
Defendant:
R. SMITH PAVING CONTRACTOR, INC. and RICHARD SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv00250
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R. SMITH and THE ESTATE OF RAE RADER SMITH
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REINERT v. SMITH et al
as 3:2019cv00204
Defendant:
LEO DUNN, BARRY SMITH, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY P REINERT
Respondent:
BARRY R. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
