Cases 31 - 40 of 170
Rudy Fabian, et al v. Richard Shenkan, et al
as 20-1743
Defendant / Appellee:
SHENKAN INJURY LAWYERS LLC and RICHARD E. SHENKAN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUDY A. FABIAN and FABIAN LEGAL SERVICES LLC
RUDY et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
LISA CHRISTINE RUDY and WILLIAM TROY RUDY
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and CALDERA MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randy Langer, et al v. Capital One Auto Finance
as 19-3875
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RANDY LANGER and JAMES LANGER
Appellant:
FABIAN LEGAL SERVICES LLC and RUDY A. FABIAN
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE
TAVERAS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv06163
Defendant:
OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3
Plaintiff:
RUDY TAVERAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMPSON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISON et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
CHAPLAIN OF CANAAN USP, IAN CONNORS, C. GOMEZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE RUSSELL SIMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv21129
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SHENKAN INJURY LAWYERS, LLC. et al v. FABIAN et al
as 2:2019cv01520
Defendant:
RUDY FABIAN and FABIAN LEGAL SERVICES, LLC.
Plaintiff:
SHENKAN INJURY LAWYERS, LLC. and RICHARD SHENKAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
USA v. Rudy Mendoza
as 19-3917
Defendant / Appellant:
RUDY MENDOZA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rudy v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 1:2019cv01854
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
William E Rudy, Jr. and John A. D'Allura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEIN v. CAMBREX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv18106
Defendant:
BERNHARD HAMPL, LOUIS J. GRABOWSKY, KATHRYN RUDIE HARRIGAN, PH.D. and others
Plaintiff:
SHIVA STEIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
