Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Daniel Smith v. USA
as 13-1411
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL SMITH, personal representative for the estate of Mary Ann Smith
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
MOHAMMAD N. DOWLUT, MD, ROBERT SCOTT, MD, ANNASHAE CORP and others
Scott v. USA
as 1:2012cv02095
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Scott, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SCOTT v. ASTRUE
as 2:2012cv05861
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
True Blue Auctions, et al v. Robert Foster, et al
as 12-2996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRUE BLUE AUCTIONS and WAYNE A. DREIBELBIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT SCOTT FOSTER and KEVIN D. LEWIS, OFFICERS OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF FRANKLIN
TRUE BLUE AUCTIONS, LLC et al v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
TRUE BLUE AUCTIONS, LLC and WAYNE A. DREIBELBIS, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT SCOTT FOSTER and KEVIN LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43666
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT, JR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SCOTT et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 5:2011cv03282
Petitioner:
ROBERT SCOTT
Respondent:
BRIAN THOMPSON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCOTT et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61168
Plaintiff:
JAMES ROBERT SCOTT and MAXINE SCOTT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC. , KEENE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE, INCORPORATED
as 2:2010cv05034
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SCOTT
Defendant:
PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE, INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
