Cases 31 - 40 of 382
USA v. Rudolph McBride
as 21-1210
Defendant / Appellant:
RUDOLPH MCBRIDE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GOLDEN v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20001
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH GOLDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Rudolph McBride
as 21-1131
Defendant / Appellant:
RUDOLPH MCBRIDE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
KIN v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2021cv00074
Defendant:
RUDOLPHE STARK and SCI FAYETTE
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL KIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GOLDEN v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00764
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. & MERCK SHARP & DOHME, CORP., MERCK SHARP & DOHME, CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH GOLDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawrence Murrell, Jr. v. Pennsylvania State Employees C, et al
as 20-3525
Defendant / Appellee:
SUSAN KRAUSE, P.S.E.C.U. Investigator, PENNSYLVANIA STATE EMPLOYEES CREDIT UNION, P.S.E.C.U. and GEORGE RUDOLPH, P.S.E.C.U. Bank President
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE MURRELL, JR.
Evans et al v. DOC Commissions et al
as 1:2020cv01663
Plaintiff:
Kwai Tilghman, Dayquan Hargroves, Jamar Robbins and others
Defendant:
Governor John Carney, All Wardens of the State of Delaware's Penitentaries and DOC Commissions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUDOLPH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv12455
Plaintiff:
LORA LEE RUDOLPH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BETZ v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv03085
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH BETZ and RUDOLPH BETZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv04666
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
