Cases 31 - 40 of 16,953
ISLAM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv05731
Plaintiff:
ZAHIRUL ISLAM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ABC BUSINESS ENTITIES 1-5 (fictitious business entities) and JOHN DOES 1-5 (fictitious individuals)
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
TELLO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv05725
Plaintiff:
Lenny Tello and Rosa Pazmino
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA d/b/a U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BETTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv05719
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY C BETTERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOSKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01845
Plaintiff:
TITO HOSKINS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lykens v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Scott Lykens
Defendant:
Colete S. Peters, James Petrucci, Stephen Spaulding and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Evelin Santiago, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1813
Petitioner:
EVELIN CALIXTO SANTIAGO, B. C. G.C. and J. J. G.C.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
TOOMER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01805
Plaintiff:
DAVID TOOMER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Edison Guaman Caguana, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1789
Petitioner:
EDISON MESIAS GUAMAN CAGUANA, CELIA GUADALUPE GUASCO MONTERO and S. M. G. G.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vandecarlos Nascimento, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1788
Petitioner:
VANDECARLOS FERREIRA DO NASCIMENTO, SANDRA MORERIRA DA SILVA, K. M. D.N. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
