Cases 31 - 40 of 17,022
Blanca Sucuzhanay-Mendia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2059
Petitioner:
BLANCA AZUCENA SUCUZHANAY-MENDIA and N. F. S.-S.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MCELROY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv06762
Plaintiff:
EDWARD P MCELROY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rafiyq Davis v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2028
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Boyer v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv02414
Plaintiff:
Lynette Boyer
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA GENERAL SERVICES ADMINSTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Pietryka et al v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
David E. Pietryka, Helen Pietryka and David P. Pietryka
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Brooks v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00914
Petitioner:
Michael Brooks
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Zierke v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Gary Zierke
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Gill v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00922
Petitioner:
Joseph Gill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Charles Jordan v. J. Barves, et al
as 24-2030
Plaintiff:
CHARLES JEROME JORDAN
Defendant:
J. BARVES, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, J. PUMPHREY, Lieutenant FCI-Schuylkill, LT. BARDO and others
TRUELOVE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02377
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC TRUELOVE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
