Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 85,075
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff: JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant: PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff: NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JAMES BARNACLE, MICHAEL TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Carbaugh, Jr. v. Warden of SCI-Coal Township et al
as 1:2024cv00737
Petitioner: Harold Carbaugh, Jr.
Respondent: Warden of SCI-Coal Township and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Raymond Howard
as 24-1787
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RAYMOND HOWARD
Hendrickes vs. Nicholas et al
as 3:2024cv00734
Petitioner: Dolly Hendrickes
Respondent: Wendy Nicholas, The Dauphin County District Attorneys Office and The Pennsylvania Office Of Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhammad v. Mason
as 1:2024cv00529
Petitioner: Walid Abdullah Muhammad, King Walid Abdullah Muhammad and Waliyd Muhammad
Respondent: Bernadette Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nita Patel v. USA
as 24-1739
Plaintiff: NITA PATEL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
COIT v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: KEVIN COIT
Defendant: SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE, PA DOC, SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
IN RE: QUINZEL CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff: QUINZEL CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05829
Petitioner: LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?