Cases 41 - 50 of 1,521
PEREZ v. THE IMA GROUP
as 2:2023cv04367
Defendant:
THE IMA GROUP also known as INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE ASSOCIATES, P.C. doing business as INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE ASSOCIATES, P.C. and INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE ASSOCIATES, P.C.
Plaintiff:
JASMINE PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Zemirah ElIn re: Zemirah El
as 23-2960
Petitioner:
In re: ZEMIRAH EL
Respondent:
BERNARD MOORE, doing business as ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK and MIA R. PEREZ
PEREZ v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv21745
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
AURORA PEREZ
Defendant:
LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, KENVUE INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GANARD v. DOORDASH INC et al
as 2:2023cv04215
Plaintiff:
DANA GANARD
Defendant:
DOORDASH INC, Marialys Perez Campos, Door Dash Essentials LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
USA v. Luis Payano-Perez
as 23-2874
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS PAYANO-PEREZ
Martinez-Perez v. Clark et al
as 2:2023cv03972
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Martinez-Perez
Defendant:
GINA CLARK, M QUINN and Dr. Paul Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01707
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Efrain Perez v. Warden Beckley FCI
as 23-2836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EFRAIN PEREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BECKLEY FCI
Martinez-Perez v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Martinez-Perez
Defendant:
Gina Clark, M. Quinn and Dr. Paul Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilbur Ramirez-Perez v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2859
Petitioner:
WILBUR RAMIREZ-PEREZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
