Cases 41 - 50 of 2,745
Burd v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Douglas Burd
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gardner v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Khashir Gardner
Defendant:
Commissioner BLANCHE CARNEY, Deputy Commissioner TERRANCE CLARK, BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CLINCHY v. JDL VENTURES CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY CLINCHY
Defendant:
JDL VENTURES CORPORATION and DOUGLAS J. BECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
CLINCHY v. JDL VENTURES CORPORATION et al
as 5:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY CLINCHY
Defendant:
JDL VENTURES CORPORATION and DOUGLAS J. BECK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Douglas Menjivar Mejia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1183
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS JAVIER MENJIVAR MEJIA, RUTH NOEMY RIVERA DE MENJIVAR, BRANDON STEVEN GAMEZ RIVERA and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DINNING v. HEALTHEC LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS DINNING
Defendant:
HEALTHEC LLC, Corewell Health, Oakwood Accountable Care Organization d/b/a Beaumont ACO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hamilton v. SP Plus Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hamilton
Defendant:
SP Plus Corporation, Marc Baumann, Alice Peterson and others
Moore v. SP Plus Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
SP Plus Corporation, Marc Baumann, Alice Peterson and others
Kenneth DouglasIn re: Kenneth Douglas
as 24-1101
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH S DOUGLAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DAVID S. CERCONE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
