Cases 41 - 50 of 85
SPRINGER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01634
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SPRINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
J. C. v. Nicholas Ford, et al
as 16-1718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. C., INDIVIDUALLY, AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS FORD, STEFFEN BOYD, JOSETTE SPRINGER and others
J.C. v. FORD et al
as 2:2015cv04745
Plaintiff:
J.C.
Defendant:
NICHOLAS FORD, STEFFEN BOYD, JOSETTE SPRINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Springer v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv00935
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Springer
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SPRINGER et al v. IMPROTA et al
as 3:2015cv01938
Plaintiff:
HOWARD SPRINGER and KEVIN SPRINGER
Defendant:
ROSE IMPROTA and RAYMOND A. FASANO
Counter_claimant:
RAYMOND A. FASANO and ROSE IMPROTA
Counter_defendant:
HOWARD SPRINGER and KEVIN SPRINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INGRIS v. DREXLER et al
as 2:2014cv02404
Plaintiff:
PETER INGRIS
Defendant:
TATIANA DREXLER, HARTMUTH HOPPE, CHRISTINE KRENTZLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRINGER et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05997
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SPRINGER , BRIAN PRZERACKI and PRZERACKI
Defendant:
PFIZER INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC, J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MUHAMMAD v. HARRIS et al
as 2:2013cv02364
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
FREDDIE HARRIS, JOSE ALVARADO, COSTA THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRINGER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2012cv05256
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SPRINGER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Springer v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00392
Plaintiff:
Errol Springer
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Perry Phelps, Cathy Escherich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
