Cases 41 - 50 of 546
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICAHEL ZAKEN, MARK HAMMER, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
COCHRAN v. TATE
as 3:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
ERIC COCHRAN, SCOTT M. DAVIS, SR., CODY A. KURTZ and others
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, C/O CRUZ, C/O HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KURTZ v. TATE et al.
as 3:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
CODY A. KURTZ, SCOTT M. DAVIS, ERIC S. COCHRAN and others
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, C.O. CRUZ, C.O. HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
McGurl, Jr. v. Little et al
as 1:2022cv01722
Plaintiff:
Harold J. McGurl, Jr.
Defendant:
George Little, Thomas McGinley, Erik Armel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Salamon et al
as 1:2022cv01715
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Defendant:
B. Salamon, Michael Rowe, Richard Ellers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. David Weaver
as 22-2901
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID WEAVER
WEAVER v. ESTOCK et al
as 5:2022cv03872
Petitioner:
LOVELLE WEAVER
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Weaver v. Moen et al
as 1:2022cv01063
Plaintiff:
Jack Weaver
Defendant:
Brent Moen, William Burke, Peter Soderberg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
