Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Dante Jackson v. Hersberger, et al
as 20-2594
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. NEWELL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HARKEL, CORRECTION OFFICER HERSBERGER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE JACKSON
WEIR v. SMITH et al
as 3:2020cv00127
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH WEIR
Defendant:
JOEL BARROWS, DAVID CLOSE, BRIAN KOVAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARROWS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv03807
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON JOHNSON &
Plaintiff:
LATOSHA BARROWS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hudson City Savings Bank v. Anita Barrow, et al
as 20-1043
Defendant:
MR. BARROW, Husband of Anita Barrow
Defendant / Appellant:
ANITA BARROW
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK
DENNIS v. SMITH et al
as 3:2020cv00017
Defendant:
MAJOR J.R. BARROWS, SERGEANT NYMAN, D. VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Louis Flick v. B. Smith, et al
as 19-3481
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPT B. R. SMITH, DEPUTY SUPT B. J. SOLOMAN and MAJOR J. R. BARROWS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS R. FLICK
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv01748
Defendant:
Major Barrows, John Wetzel, Captain Acey and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stockton v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2019cv01930
Defendant:
C.O. M. Miller, P.S.S.-B Dubler, HEX Shawn Wiggins and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. DRISCOLL et al
as 3:2019cv00143
Defendant:
JOEL BARROWS, DAVID CLOSE, SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMTIH and others
Plaintiff:
ARNELL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Stockton v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv01429
Defendant:
Sgt. Vereshack, D.J. Close, C.O. Reyman and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
