Cases 41 - 50 of 57
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-11
as 2:2012cv03141
Plaintiff:
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-11
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
PATRICK COLLINS, INC. v. JOHN DOES 1-11
as 2:2012cv02079
Plaintiff:
PATRICK COLLINS, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-11
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-11
as 2:2012cv00667
Plaintiff:
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-11
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
STOLINSKI v. PENNYPACKER et al
as 1:2011cv04378
Plaintiff:
GARY L. STOLINSKI
Defendant:
LT. JAY PENNYPACKER, COLONEL JOSEPH R. FUENTES, MAJ. HEIDI SCRIPTURE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAMS et al v. SPRINGMEYER et al
as 2:2011cv00790
Plaintiff:
GARY A. ADAMS , DENISE ADAMS , SHAQUEL ADAMS RILEY and others
Defendant:
KAREN SPRINGMEYER and JOHN DOE 1-11
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIDIANO v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2010cv04483
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO DIDIANO
Defendant:
KAREN BALICKI , SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON , JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DIDIANO v. BALICKI et al
as 1:2010cv01776
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO DIDIANO
Defendant:
KAREN BALICKI, SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON, JOHN DOE(S) 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KARPF v. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv01401
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS K. KARPF
Defendant:
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, MASS MUTUAL FINANCIAL GROUP, FIRST FINANCIAL GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CIEMNIECKI v. PARKER MCCAY P.A. et al
as 1:2009cv06450
Plaintiff:
SHEILA CIEMNIECKI
Defendant:
PARKER MCCAY P.A., RAY DISANTO, THE CENTRAL RECORD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
