Cases 41 - 50 of 72
GODWIN et al v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv04602
Plaintiff:
MARILYN S. GODWIN and RONALD D. GODWIN
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC, J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEEPSTAR MARINE, INC. v. GODWIN PUMPS OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06112
Plaintiff:
DEEPSTAR MARINE, INC.
Defendant:
GODWIN PUMPS OF AMERICA, INC. and XYLEM INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
COKE v. GODWIN
as 2:2012cv03926
Plaintiff:
LESTER COKE-JIM SHOWER POSSE BROWN JR - LYNDELL KULLUM-EL'AMEER SHAREF LAHAB KULLUM YAGA COKE
Defendant:
VALERIE GODWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNNING et al v. H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv67439
Plaintiff:
GODWIN M. DUNNING and MARY J. DUNNING
Defendant:
H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GODWIN v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv66805
Plaintiff:
MARION B. GODWIN
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GODWIN v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66997
Plaintiff:
MARION B. GODWIN
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
YI v. CONRAN et al
as 3:2011cv02743
Plaintiff:
KYUNG SUCK YI
Defendant:
JOHN J. CONRAN, JR. , WHIPPER SNAPPER TRANSPORT and GEORGE S. GODWIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GODWIN et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2011cv64801
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H GODWIN and CARRIE E GODWIN
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of James Godwin v. Smith
as 1:2011cv00330
Defendant:
Dennis L. Smith
Plaintiff:
Estate of James Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Godwin v. Costello et al
as 1:2011cv00083
Plaintiff:
Seane Godwin
Defendant:
Costello, Scarborough, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
