Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HATCHER v. SCM GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2015cv01630
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO HATCHER
Defendant:
SCM GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jamal Hatcher v. Superintendent Albion SCI, et al
as 15-1183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAL HATCHER
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
HATCHER v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2014cv07025
Petitioner:
JAMAL HATCHER
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FLOWERS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv06356
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FLOWERS , JUDAH WILLIAMS , BRADY FLOYD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY WALKER, THOMAS LICIARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HATCHER et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP.
as 2:2014cv06053
Plaintiff:
NICKOLE HATCHER and GREGORY HATCHER
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HATCHER v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2014cv03943
Petitioner:
JAMAL HATCHER
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HATCHER v. GIROUX et al
as 2:2014cv01022
Petitioner:
HASAAN HATCHER
Respondent:
NANCY GIROUX and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PERELLI et al
as 5:2013cv04423
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSEPH PERELLI and KATHY A. HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
