Cases 41 - 50 of 57
In re: Samuel Opara
as 13-3323
Petitioner:
In re: SAMUEL OPARA
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FORT DIX FCI, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and others
Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
TALLEY v. SIMANDLE
as 2:2013cv03984
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. TALLEY
Defendant:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TALLEY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 3:2013cv04317
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. TALLEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Ravanna Bey, et al
as 13-2897
Petitioner:
In re: RAVANNA S. BEY
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and TEMPERANCE WILLIAMSON
Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
KEMP BEY et al v. ARTIS et al
as 3:2013cv02695
Petitioner:
DWAYNE KEMP BEY and RICHARD DIXON BEY
Respondent:
LAWRENCE ARTIS, BURLINGTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JEROME B. SIMANDLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
In re: Clinton Barlow
as 13-1320
Petitioner:
In re: CLINTON C. BARLOW
Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE and FREDA L. WOLFSON
In re: Michael Garcia, et al
as 12-3250
Petitioner - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL A. GARCIA
Respondent - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DONNA ZICKEFOOSE, Warden
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
In re: Michael Garcia
as 12-3049
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL A. GARCIA
Defendant - Respondent:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
PRALL v. SIMANDLE
as 3:2012cv01886
Plaintiff:
TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE, FREDA L. WOLFSON, CAMDEN DISTRICT COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Tormu Prall
as 11-4011
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B SIMANDLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
