Cases 41 - 50 of 258
Boldrini v. Jane Doe et al
as 3:2022cv00929
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Ms KTT Jane Doe, Mr. Siedel John Doe (D), Mr. Chris Hill, U.S.M.2019-2022 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KLINGENSMTH v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A
as 2:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KLINGENSMITH
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A doing business as CHASE BANKCARD SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Default
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stuart Weichsel v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
as 21-3371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STUART WEICHSEL, individually and on behalf of all others similary situated
Defendant / Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA
MO v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A. et al
as 2:2021cv20564
Plaintiff:
SUNG H. MO
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., US BANCORP, TIAA BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv20333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
PEARSALL v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
as 2:2021cv03911
Plaintiff:
SHYNELL PEARSALL
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Susan Staropoli, et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co, et al
as 21-2500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN STAROPOLI, individually, and on behalf of Sam Staropolo and AVA STAROPOLI
Defendant / Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA and JP MORGAN CHASE US BENEFITS EXECUTIVE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
