Cases 41 - 50 of 303
HENRY v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2022cv05802
Plaintiff:
JAMAL M. HENRY
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. REYNOLDS, SHELBY SCHEFFLER and RIZWAN BAKHAT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Jamal Eberhardt
as 22-2804
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMAL EBERHARDT
COMBS v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2022cv02987
Lead Plaintiff:
Combs Jamal Dumar
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DUMAR JAMAL COMBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ROSS et al v. CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv02632
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ROSS, JAMAL MOORE, ROBERT SMITH and others
Defendant:
CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION
USA v. Jamal Eddings
as 22-2281
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMAL EDDINGS
Campbell v. Condrad et al
as 3:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
Michael Jamal Campbell
Defendant:
Detective Corey Michael Condrad, Detective Munley, Detective Zech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2022cv02792
Plaintiff:
James Jamal Brown
Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sergeant Michael Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Jamal Turnquest
as 22-2195
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMAL TURNQUEST, a/k/a Pop; a/k/a P.
Campbell v. Lowery et al
as 4:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
Michael Jamal Campbell
Defendant:
Officer Joshua Lowery, Welsh's Towing Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KENNON v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv04184
Plaintiff:
MARQIS KENNON
Defendant:
STEVEN JOHNSON, BRUCE DAVIS, AMY M. EMRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
