Cases 41 - 50 of 92
John Payne, Sr. v. Superintendent Frackville SCI, et al
as 15-3055
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT FRACKVILLE SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT PAYNE, SR.
John McCool v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 15-1035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT MCCOOL
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
John McCool, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 15-1020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT MCCOOL
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Banks v. McCafferty et al
as 1:2014cv01234
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Landya McCafferty, Joseph N. Laplante, Steven J. McAuliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYNE v. TRITT et al
as 1:2014cv00119
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBERT PAYNE, SR.
Respondent:
TRITT , DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, PA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 14-1219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DIRECTOR CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED NATIONS, EUROPEAN UNION and MEXICO EMBASSY
McCool v. Commonwealth of PA
as 4:2014cv00083
Plaintiff:
John Robert McCool
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCool v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 4:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
John Robert McCool
Defendant:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2013cv03014
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Director of Central Intelligence, National Security Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CIAROLLA et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv01741
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT CIAROLLA , SHARON P. HEINNICKEL and DAWN LYNN O'CONNOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
