Cases 41 - 50 of 200
VINOSKY v. CONSIGLIO et al
as 3:2020cv00134
Plaintiff:
SCOTT M. VINOSKY
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN DOE, LEO BERG, MAUREEN LETCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv03318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
FREDERICK LOGAN COMPANY, INC. v. R.C.E. HEAT EXCHANGERS, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00736
Defendant:
ROBERT STROBEL, JR., MICHAEL E. EARL and R.C.E. HEAT EXCHANGERS, LLC
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK LOGAN COMPANY, INC.
Counter Claimant:
R.C.E. INDUSTRIAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pew v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00668
Defendant:
Shawn P Kenny, Dorina Varner, Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOGAN v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv06171
Plaintiff:
MERRY LOGAN
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC., SECANT MEDICAL, LLC, SECANT MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garza et al v. Atlantic Development Corporation of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2019cv01664
Defendant:
Atlantic Development Corporation of Pennsylvania, Bryan Biser, ABC Entities 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Christal King, Logan Blake and Christopher Garza
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
LOGAN v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03942
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
VALERIA LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAESTRO PRINT MANAGEMENT, LLC et al v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03595
Plaintiff:
MAESTRO PRINT MANAGEMENT, LLC, THOMAS F. DONNELLON and SHIVAKUMAR R. PALANISWAMI
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. and LOGAN MARKETING GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
