Cases 41 - 50 of 1,685
DAVIS v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01927
Plaintiff:
LISA D DAVIS
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Calloway v Department of Health, et al
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Jesse Calloway, IV
Defendant:
Department of Health, Division of Vital Records and Lisa L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NAIL v. LIDL US, LLC
as 2:2024cv01625
Plaintiff:
Lisa M Nail and LISA MARIE NAIL
Defendant:
LIDL US, LLC and LIDL US OPERATIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CASTRO-MOTA v. CLARK et al.
as 2:2024cv01622
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA
Defendant:
WARDEN TERREA MOJOR CLARK, C.O. OFFICER, LISA DURANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. MCCRADY et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
ZAMA ELOAH BEY and Candace Rae Winstead
Defendant:
JENNIFER MCCRADY, ATTORNEY LISA VANQUEZ, DEREK DAYOUB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCULLEN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCULLEN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, SECRETARY DR. HARRY LAUREL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
