Cases 41 - 50 of 75
TUCKER-JACKSON et al v. UPLAND BOROUGH et al
as 2:2014cv04041
Plaintiff:
RELVIA TUCKER-JACKSON and NEIL TUCKER
Defendant:
UPLAND BOROUGH , JOHN EASTON , STEPHEN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KIRBY v. UPLAND BOROUGH et al
as 2:2014cv04012
Plaintiff:
MARK KIRBY
Defendant:
UPLAND BOROUGH , JOHN R. EASTON , NELSON OCASIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
AIKEN et al v. EADY et al
as 2:2014cv00811
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA AIKEN , EDPDLAW, LTD. , LUIS OCASIO and others
Defendant:
KIRK EADY, OSCAR AVILES , THOMAS A. DEGISE and others
Cross_claimant:
OSCAR AVILES and THOMAS A. DEGISE
Cross_defendant:
OSCAR AVILES , THOMAS A. DEGISE and ABC AND XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-20
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
NALL v. BOROUGH OF UPLAND et al
as 2:2013cv06807
Plaintiff:
JOY NALL
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF UPLAND and OCASIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SANTANA v. THOMAS et al
as 5:2013cv05407
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL OCASIO SANTANA
Respondent:
JOHN THOMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Carlos Ocasio
as 13-2966
Petitioner:
In re: CARLOS OCASIO
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
OCASIO v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00449
Plaintiff:
DIANA OCASIO
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC. and GREENSTONE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv07100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
OCASIO v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv06434
Plaintiff:
PEDRO OCASIO
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
