Cases 41 - 50 of 90
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
PONCE-PEREZ v. SMITH
as 3:2017cv00166
Petitioner:
MANUEL PONCE-PEREZ
Respondent:
CHRISTIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01617
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SUY et al v. PONCE et al
as 2:2017cv03029
Plaintiff:
CINDY SUY and TONG PHAL
Defendant:
JOSEPH PONCE , POY HOLDINGS, INC. , POY AUTO PARTS SUPPLY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Hector Ponce-Verduzco v. Attorney General United State
as 17-1684
Petitioner:
HECTOR PONCE VERDUZCO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carroll v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2016cv09355
Plaintiff:
Kelly Carroll, Chrystiane Layog and Antonio Ponce
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. and WELLS FARGO
Intervenor_plaintiff:
MICHAEL DEVITO, Yvette Ramirez, Bernadette Richard and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
ESCOBAR-PONCE v. TRIPP
as 3:2016cv00250
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR ESCOBAR-PONCE
Respondent:
WARDEN TRIPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Antonello Boldrini v. Martin Wilson, et al
as 16-3565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN R. WILSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY D. PETER JOHNSON, JANE DOE, Personally and in his official capacity as Secretary of the District Attorney of Union County PA and others
GARCIA-PONCE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03549
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL GARCIA-PONCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00244
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
