Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Holmes v. Bledsoe et al
as 4:2010cv01043
Plaintiff:
Adrian S. Holmes
Defendant:
Warden Bledsoe, B Trate, Perrian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARRISON v. ATLANTIC (REGION) OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER et al
as 1:2010cv02294
Plaintiff:
NEIL HARRISON
Defendant:
ATLANTIC (REGION) OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROBERT MORAN and NELLY MARQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Holt et al
as 4:2010cv00681
Petitioner:
Pedro Ramos
Respondent:
Ronnie Holt and Northeast Regional Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HUR v. V.A. REGIONAL OFFICES et al
as 2:2008cv05488
Plaintiff:
BENNIE N. HUR
Defendant:
V.A. REGIONAL OFFICES and V.A. HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GASKINS v. SANTORUM et al
as 2:2008cv01499
Plaintiff:
KONOTA A. GASKINS
Defendant:
RICK SANTORUM, RANDY VULAKOVICH, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE, MANOR COMPLEX and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Guerrero v. DEWEY et al
as 3:2008cv01568
Plaintiff:
Fernando Escobedo Guerrero
Defendant:
DEWEY, Case Manager at FCI Allwenwood Medium, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jones v. Federal B.O.P. Records Office et al
as 3:2008cv00712
Petitioner:
Stephen T. Jones
Respondent:
Federal B.O.P. Records Office, Harley Lapin, Kelly McMahan and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CURTIS v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2007cv03391
Petitioner:
TYRONE WILLIAM CURTIS
Respondent:
CHARLES SAMUELS, MEDICAL DEPT. FORT DIX, REGIONAL OFFICE PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
STANKEVITCH v. THE SSA LOCAL OFFICE et al
as 2:2007cv01948
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRE STANKEVITCH
Defendant:
THE SSA LOCAL OFFICE, THE SSA REGIONAL OFFICE. and THE CITIZENS BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
