Cases 41 - 50 of 258
LAFORET v. ROTH et al
as 2:2020cv12392
Defendant:
JOHN ROTH, THOMAS MULVEY, GERALDINE ENTRUP and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAFORET
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. PRATT et al
as 3:2020cv10269
Defendant:
SHEREEF M. ELNAHAL, C. WILLAIMS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holguin et al v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2020cv00615
Plaintiff:
James Kalkstein, Carole Smith, Ernest Holguin and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLS v. ENDEAVOR AIR, INC et al
as 2:2020cv00566
Defendant:
KATHERINE ROTH, MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ENDEAVOR AIR, INC and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTYNA MILLS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1140
ROTH v. TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv03425
Defendant:
IRENE MILLER, JOSEPH H. MOGLIA, ALLAN R. TESSLER and others
Plaintiff:
MARC ROTH
ROTH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv02691
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ROTH
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROTH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv01438
Plaintiff:
BARBI ROTH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRIGGS v. BATIHK et al
as 5:2020cv00438
Defendant:
ROBERT HAWKE, JONATHAN G. ROTH, ELIAS M. BATIHK and others
Plaintiff:
BARRETT Q. GRIGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROTH v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04497
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CONSTANCE ROTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOMEZ et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2019cv04413
Defendant:
SGT. MICHAEL DEAN, DET. LT. K. FRY, ANNIE P. ROTH and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ, GOMEZ FAMILY, ELIZABETH GOMEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
