Cases 41 - 50 of 66
BANKS v. REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, et al.
as 2:2013cv01025
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
REALTY COUNSELING COMPANY, JIM SPROUT, CASE MANAGER ANESBURG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 1:2013cv01751
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Ten Unknown Named SHU Correctional Officers of FCC Forest City, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEINER v. WERDLINGER et al
as 2:2013cv02849
Plaintiff:
IRA WEINER
Defendant:
R. WERDLINGER, C. MAIORANA, ABIGAIL LOPEZ DELASALLE, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hai Liu v. Attorney General United State
as 13-2174
Petitioner:
HAI SHU LIU
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sanders v. Holt et al
as 1:2013cv00822
Plaintiff:
Lamont Sanders
Defendant:
Ron Holt, SHU Lieutenant, Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shu Cai v. Attorney General United State
as 12-2452
Petitioner:
SHU RONG CAI
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SHU v. NOODLE RESTAURANT, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv02845
Defendant:
NOODLE RESTAURANT, INC., YU CHUAN XU and YING ZI XU
Plaintiff:
YU SHU
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Linda Lienardy Lie, et al v. Attorney General United State
as 12-2254
Petitioner:
LINDA LIENARDY-LIE, a/k/a Lie Shu Ling, PHOE PEK JAN and HERYANTO HERYANTO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SHU v. COLUMBIA LABORATORIES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00963
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SHU
Defendant:
COLUMBIA LABORATORIES, INC., FRANK C. CONDELLA, JR., LAWRENCE A. GYENES and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MA et al
as 2:2011cv05152
Defendant:
XIAO YING MA, TRONG D. NGUYEN, ESTATE OF TROY D. NGUYEN and others
Plaintiff:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
