Cases 41 - 50 of 949
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Catanzaro v. 4Imprint Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01753
Plaintiff:
David J. Catanzaro
Defendant:
4Imprint Inc., Does 1 Through 50, 4 All Promos, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2727
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
v. SJ DIRECT LLC et al
as 2:2022cv04385
Defendant:
SJ DIRECT LLC, MICHAEL BROWN, GLENN STREIDEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
SJ DIRECT LLC v. BROWN et al
as 2:2022cv04388
Plaintiff:
SJ DIRECT LLC
Defendant:
MICHAEL BROWN, GLENN STREIDEL, UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM SERVICES OF TEXAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
NEWTEK SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC v. TEXAS FIRST CAPITAL, INC.
as 5:2022cv02461
Plaintiff:
NEWTEK SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC
Defendant:
TEXAS FIRST CAPITAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
YANNUZZI v. F.B.I EL PASO TEXAS ARRESTING OFFICER et al
as 2:2022cv01919
Plaintiff:
DON EDWARD YANNUZZI, SR.
Defendant:
F.B.I EL PASO TEXAS ARRESTING OFFICER, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE DRIVER ON JULY 13TH 2020 and NAME UNKNOWN FDC PHILLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
