Cases 41 - 50 of 263
Damion Whitaker v. SCI Camp Hill
as 20-3207
Defendant:
CAMP HILL SCI
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JESSIE HERNANDEZ
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMION WHITAKER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv15112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
JOYNER, III et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv14212
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOYNER, III, CAROLYN WHITAKER and THE ESTATE OF CAROLYN WHITAKER
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WHITAKER-JONES v. TULL
as 2:2020cv04993
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WHITAKER-JONES
Defendant:
MICHAEL TULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivan McKinney v. George Robinson, et al
as 20-2770
Defendant:
OFFICER WHITAKER, OFFICER IRWIN, ASST. SUPERINTENDENT GEORGE ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ASST. ADMINISTRATOR ANTONIO CAMPOS
WHITAKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03413
Plaintiff:
MARK WHITAKER
Defendant:
STEVEN VIVARINA, DET. JOHN MCDERMOTT, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. Martin
as 3:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
David A Whitaker
Defendant:
James C Martin and James Clevenger Martin Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01837
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitaker v. Gray et al
as 1:2020cv00219
Defendant:
TWP-Borough-Police Department of Yadon, Pennsylvania, Gregory Carbaugh, Gregory Piotica and others
Plaintiff:
Damion Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker et al v. SCI Camp Hill Correction
as 1:2020cv00117
Defendant:
SCI Camp Hill Correction
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hernandez and Damion Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
