Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 51 - 60 of 636
LENGLE et al v. ESPEJO
as 5:2023cv00697
Plaintiff: RACHEL LENGLE and TODD LENGLE
Defendant: PABLO RAMIREZ ESPEJO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Franklin Ramirez-Perez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1314
Petitioner: Y. R. M. and FRANKLIN RAMIREZ-PEREZ
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
QUINONES v. RAMIREZ
as 2:2023cv00860
Petitioner: KEVIN QUINONES
Respondent: RAMIREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
QUINONES v. RAMIREZ et al
as 2:2023cv00862
Plaintiff: KEVIN QUINONES
Defendant: MARABEL RAMIREZ, MATTHEW JORDAN and JEREB/MARY KATE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUINONES v. RAMIREZ et al
as 2:2023cv00859
Plaintiff: KEVIN QUINONES
Defendant: MARABEL RAMIREZ, MATTHEW JORDAN, ALANA JEREB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00371
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
QUINONES v. RAMIREZ et al
as 2:2023cv00264
Plaintiff: KEVIN QUINONES
Defendant: MARABEL RAMIREZ, MATTHEW JORDAN, REBECCA TUNIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yaksima v. Tuzinski et al
as 3:2023cv00008
Plaintiff: Amy Yaksima
Defendant: Andrew John Tuzinski, Nickloas Basov, Anthony Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bernardo Arias Ramirez v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-3424
Petitioner: BERNARDO ANDRES ARIAS RAMIREZ
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ramirez v. Sage We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv01978
Petitioner: Wilson Ramirez
Respondent: Warden J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?