Cases 51 - 60 of 140
STRATTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03351
Plaintiff:
TYREE STRATTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PEAY v. SAGER et al
as 1:2016cv00130
Plaintiff:
STRATTON PEAY
Defendant:
SAGER, BERRY, SMAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
LM INSURANCE CORPORATION v. MTD PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02504
Plaintiff:
LM INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
MTD PRODUCTS, INC. , BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION and MTD CONSUMER GROUP, INC.
Cross_claimant:
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
MTD PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
In re: Tyree Stratton
as 16-2360
Petitioner:
In re: TYREE STRATTON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STRATTON et al v ZIMMER, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01572
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN STRATTON and BRENNA STRATTON
Defendant:
ZIMMER INC., ZIMMER HOLDINGS INC., ZIMMER US INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATSON v. CHESTER COUNTY NISSAN, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00571
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY WATSON
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY NISSAN, LLC , JOHN D. STRATTON and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Stratton Peay v. J. Fisher, et al
as 15-3792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STRATTON PEAY
Defendant - Appellee:
J. FISHER, Supt, L. OLIVER, J. WHITESEL, Deputy and others
DENNY et al v. BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION et al
as 3:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DENNY and AMY DENNY
Defendant:
BRIGGS & STRATTON CORPORATION , BRIGGS & STRATTON POWER PRODUCTS GROUP, LLC and LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fassett et al v. Sears Holdings Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00941
Plaintiff:
Daniel Fassett and Leslie Fassett
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Corporation , Sears, Roebuck and Co. , Sears Hometown and Outlet Stores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peay v. Fisher et al
as 3:2015cv00345
Plaintiff:
Stratton Peay
Defendant:
J. Fisher, L. Oliver, J. Whitesel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
