Cases 51 - 60 of 106
Sarro et al v. Burley et al
as 1:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
Darius Sarro and Lynell B. Tucker
Defendant:
Katrina Burley, Lezley Sexton, Officer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LATIMER et al v. WILLIAM PATERSON UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2016cv02929
Plaintiff:
JAHMEL J. LATIMER and DARIUS E. SINGLETON
Defendant:
WILLIAM PATERSON UNIVERSITY , KATHLEEN WALDRON , WILLIAM PATERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
U.S.Bank National Association v. Woodley et al
as 3:2016cv00940
Plaintiff:
U.S.Bank National Association
Defendant:
Darius Woodley and Molita Woodley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JACKSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2016cv00345
Petitioner:
DARIUS JACKSON
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grezak v. Marzec Law Firm et al
as 3:2015cv02368
Plaintiff:
Grazyna S Grezak
Defendant:
Marzec Law Firm and Darius A Marzec
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHEN et al v. MASON et al
as 2:2015cv05128
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CHEN and STEPHANIE CHEN
Defendant:
DARIUS MASON and VENEZLA MASON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROBINSON v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2015cv06716
Plaintiff:
DARIUS ROBINSON
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, LYNN KOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv04926
Petitioner:
DARIUS JACKSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCGRUDER et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04917
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE MCGRUDER and DARIUS MCGRUDER
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guevara v. Ale House Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00409
Plaintiff:
Willy Guevara
Defendant:
Ale House Inc., Cherry Tree Hospitality LLC and Darius Mansoory
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
