Cases 51 - 60 of 575
Syster v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00460
Plaintiff:
James Syster
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Beard and Medical Staff at SCI-Camp Hill, names unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Rhonshawn Jackson, et al
as 12-1657
Petitioner:
RHONSHAWN JACKSON
Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, SHIRLEY SMEAL, LAWLER and others
DAVIS v. RADLE et al
as 2:2012cv01096
Plaintiff:
ANDRE DAVIS
Defendant:
RADLE, FARRANTI, QUICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roulhac v. Lawler et al
as 1:2012cv00311
Plaintiff:
Paul Khalifah Roulhac
Defendant:
R. M. Lawler, Mary Lou Showalter, Shoaf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Rega v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 12-1316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE REGA
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of the D.O.C., LEON MOORE, MICHELLE L. LUCAS and others
Daniel Wesley v. Beard, et al., et al
as 11-4373
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL WESLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD
Thomas Julian v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 11-4331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS JULIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, KATHLEEN ZWIERZYNA, MICHAEL HARLOW and others
JACKSON v. TAYLOR, et al
as 3:2011cv00265
Plaintiff:
RHONSHAWN JACKSON
Defendant:
TAYLOR , ENGLISH , R.H.U. LT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antyane Robinson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 11-9003
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTYANE ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, LOUIS FOLINO, superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at Greene, FRANKLIN TENNIS, Superintendent of State Correctional Institution at Rockview and others
Franklin Weimer v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 11-3972
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKLIN JOSEPH WEIMER
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Commissioner, Department of Corrections and LOUIS FOLINO, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Greene
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
