Cases 51 - 60 of 652
FAYE v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv06132
Petitioner:
ADAMA FAYE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JOHN P. TORRES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tosin Adegbuji v. US Atty Gen, et al
as 08-4716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOSIN ADEGBUJI
Defendant - Appellee:
US ATTY GEN, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO GONZALEZ and others
BARCALA v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv05712
Plaintiff:
RICARDO BARCALA
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONALEZ, EVANGELINA KLAPAKIS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv06033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CURRIER v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv06013
Petitioner:
DAVION CURRIER
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, HQCDU and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WRAY v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv06042
Petitioner:
LENFORD P. WRAY
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, SCOTT WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ABOULEDAHAB v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv05639
Plaintiff:
YOUSEF AHMED ABOULEDAHAB
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONALEZ, EVANGELINA KLAPAKIS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
PARSIAN v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv05641
Plaintiff:
NADER PARSIAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONALEZ, EVANGELINA KLAPAKIS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ORTEGA-VIGO v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2008cv05857
Petitioner:
YOLANDA ORTEGA-VIGO
Respondent:
RACHEL MARTINEZ, MICHAEL MUKASEY and MICHAEL CHERTOFF
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MUKHIN et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv05794
Plaintiff:
NIKOLAY MUKHIN and YELENA MUKHINA
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, JONATHAN SCHARFEN, JOHN THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
