Cases 51 - 60 of 516
Webb v. Sage
as 1:2022cv01078
Petitioner:
Markeith John Webb
Respondent:
Warden J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Courtney Webb v. Clairton City School District
as 22-2125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COURTNEY R. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CLAIRTON CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
David Webb v. City of Wilmington, et al
as 22-2109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF WILMINGTON, Government, NEW CASTLE COUNTY, Government, MICHAEL S. PURZYCKI, Mayor and others
Webb v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00670
Plaintiff:
David Q. Webb
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Melissa Anne Greller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WATERMAN v. VIDLER WATER RESOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
VIDLER WATER RESOURCES, INC., MAXIM C. W. WEBB, DOROTHY A TAMIAN-PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Wilhelm v. Vidler Water Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Vidler Water Resources, Inc., Maxim C.W. Webb, Dorothy Timian-Palmer and others
Webb v. Hall et al
as 1:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
David Q. Webb
Defendant:
Attorney James P. Hall, Kimberly A. Parks, Mary F. Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
David WebbIn re: David Webb
as 22-1708
Petitioner:
In re: DAVID Q. WEBB
Respondent:
CITY OF WILMINGTON, Government, NEW CASTLE COUNTY, Government, MICHAEL S. PURZYCKI, Mayor and others
Webb v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
David Q. Webb
Defendant:
State of Delaware, Molly K. Magarik, Renee P. Beaman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
