Cases 61 - 70 of 218
CONAWAY v. LESKINEN et al
as 2:2018cv01684
Defendant:
JUDGE STEVEN LESKINEN, CAPTAIN DAVID J. RUTTER, LT. THOMAS ROLENCIK and others
Plaintiff:
HERBERT DALE CONAWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BOWER V NRA GROUP, LLC, ET AL
as 1:2018cv00389
Defendant:
DOES 1-5 and NRA GROUP, LLC.
Plaintiff:
ELEN BOWER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bower v. United States Department of Labor
as 4:2018cv02180
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bower
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
DILLINGER v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2018cv01491
Petitioner:
JOSEPH R. DILLINGER
Respondent:
RICHARD BOWER, ROBERT GILMORE and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Beam et al
as 1:2018cv02108
Defendant:
Zak Huth, John R. Holty, Mike Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
BOWERS v. FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
as 1:2018cv00254
Petitioner:
MARQUISE J. BOWERS
Respondent:
FCI MCKEAN, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ARISON et al v. FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2018cv00845
Defendant:
ANGELA ZIMMERLINK, RICH BOWER, FAYETTE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff:
DANTE RIPLEY, MIRANDA ARISON, CHARLES SMITH, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARINKOVIC v. BATTAGLIA et al
as 2:2018cv00388
Plaintiff:
MEL MARINKOVIC
Defendant:
DAVID K. BATTAGLIA, ROBERT T. BOWER, RICHARD L. FINK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWERS v. LANCASTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2017cv01508
Plaintiff:
KENT C. BOWERS
Defendant:
LANCASTER TOWNSHIP and DAVID SITLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pritchett v. Goldanowski et al
as 3:2017cv02085
Plaintiff:
Leonard Pritchett
Defendant:
John Doe Goldanowski, John Doe Mackelvenski, Eddie Salvette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
