Cases 61 - 70 of 433
Gregory et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
Steven Gregory, Tammy Gregory, Shannon Gregory, II and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00761
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Michael Jones, Sarah Jones and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
LAWSON v. SCI PHOENIX'S GINA CLARK et al
as 2:2022cv01193
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
GINA CLARK, MANDY BISER SIPPLE, PAMELA SELLERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWSON v. DICK SPORTING GOODS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01560
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALEX LAWSON
Defendant:
DICK SPORTING GOODS, INC., EDWARD STACK and LOSS PREVENTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
LAWSON v. CALDWELL
as 1:2022cv01324
Petitioner:
CHARLES A. LAWSON
Respondent:
WARDEN EUGENE CALDWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tyree LawsonIn re: Tyree Lawson
as 22-1442
Petitioner:
In re: TYREE LAWSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Carla Mader, et al v. Union Township, et al
as 22-1425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLA M. MADER and MARTIN E. MADER
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF UNION, HEATHER DAERR, CHARLES TRAX, JR. and others
BAKER v. LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC., MICHAEL G DECATA, ANDREW B ALBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Finger v. Lawson Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
Lawson Products, Inc., Michael G. Decata, Andrew H. Albert, I and others
LAWSON v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2022cv01002
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. LAWSON
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND, VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, ARRESTING OFFICER JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
