Cases 61 - 70 of 89
TAYLOR et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2011cv64752
Plaintiff:
BYRON TAYLOR and CAROLYN M TAYLOR
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65156
Plaintiff:
RONALD G TAYLOR and CAROLYN M TAYLOR
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00274
Plaintiff:
Leonard M. Taylor
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, City of Wilmington, Wilmington Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. QUINONES et al
as 1:2010cv04670
Plaintiff:
JEMELLE BROWN
Defendant:
M. QUINONES, ERIC M. TAYLOR and JOSEPH RIPA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv71070
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOURATIDIS et al v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2010cv02964
Plaintiff:
LOUIE MOURATIDIS
Defendant:
ERIC M. TAYLOR, CHRIS CHRISTIE and And Any Unknown Individual Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Melissa M. Taylor
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
TAYLOR v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 2:2009cv92637
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PUCHAKJIAN v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2009cv06258
Plaintiff:
CHARLES C. PUCHAKJIAN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, ERIK M. TAYLOR and PETER FARLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
TAYLOR et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88223
Plaintiff:
LLOYD M. TAYLOR and PAT TAYLOR
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
