Cases 61 - 70 of 3,034
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
GEBRU v. PHILLIPS
as 2:2023cv05001
Plaintiff:
LYU YELMA GEBRU
Defendant:
BRIAN PHILLIPS, JOHN DOE and ABC CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv01435
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Wheels Up Experience Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HARMON v. PHILLIPS
as 1:2023cv22974
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL HARMON
Defendant:
SCOTT PHILLIPS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Gilardy v. Beyond Meat, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gilardy
Defendant:
Ethan Brown, Mark J. Nelson, Phillip E. Hardin and others
Nominal Defendant:
Beyond Meat, Inc.
BONANNO v. SAGE
as 2:2023cv02092
Petitioner:
PHILLIP J. BONANNO
Respondent:
JESSICA SAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phillips v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 4:2023cv02040
Petitioner:
Curtis Clay Phillips, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Deputy Warden Joseph McCoy, WARDEN AND/OR DEPUTY John (Doe) Haidel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Elad v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01360
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Elad
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Joshua Collins, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
