Cases 61 - 70 of 12,149
Bouchard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Bouchard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KNIGHT v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv01216
Defendant:
SGT. WEISS, COWEN, PREA LT. HOLLIS and others
Plaintiff:
SPENCER KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01444
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Raheemah Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
WLADYSLAWSKI v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv08712
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
PAUL WLADYSLAWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
KERR v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01201
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KERR
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hoover v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01432
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann Hoover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TERRY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv08680
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
PHYLLIS TERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LASKO v. MARION SECURITY AGENCY et al
as 3:2024cv08629
Plaintiff:
JAMES LASKO
Defendant:
JACQUELINE VORONOV and MARION SECURITY AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
