Cases 61 - 70 of 94,850
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Coles et al
as 2:2024cv02469
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
Ricky Coles and Kimberly Henley-Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FORRESTER
as 2:2024cv02465
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
WILFRED FORRESTER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345 Mail Fraud Injunction
Blanchard Jr et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00932
Plaintiff:
Glennister Blanchard Jr and Kathleen Blanchard
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
Chi v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Anson Chi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Askin Ozturk v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2058
Petitioner:
ASKIN OZTURK
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Blanca Sucuzhanay-Mendia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2059
Petitioner:
BLANCA AZUCENA SUCUZHANAY-MENDIA and N. F. S.-S.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. TITEFLEX CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv06709
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY
Defendant:
TITEFLEX CORPORATION and LAURY HEATING COOLING, LLC doing business as LAURY HEATING COOLING & PLUMBING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Lombardo et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02422
Plaintiff:
David Lombardo and Michelle Lombardo
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASAULTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Morton v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASAULTY COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02425
Plaintiff:
Roy Morton
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASAULTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
