Cases 71 - 80 of 251
Hannah v. Allergan Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv11344
Defendant:
ALLERGAN INC., MCGHAN MEDICAL CORPORATION, INAMED CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer L. Hannah
In Re:
IN RE: ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANNAH v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03559
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA HANNAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WELTCH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03432
Plaintiff:
MATT DELATOUR, KARLY SOLDNER, NINA FROGGATT and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. ALLERGAN INC. et al
as 2:2020cv08900
Defendant:
ALLERGAN PLC, ALLERGAN INC. and ALLERGAN USA INC.
Plaintiff:
HANNAH TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUGH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03508
Plaintiff:
CALLUM WILSON, MAHEEN SHAFI, CHRISTOPHER ROMANO and others
Defendant:
DENNIS WILSON, JANE/JOHN DOES 1-100, RICHARD NICOLETTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
KIM v. KOREAN AIR LINES et al
as 2:2020cv03636
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5, ABC COMPANIES 1-5, DELTA AIR LINES and others
Plaintiff:
HANNAH KIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02969
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Worrall et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv01152
Defendant:
TARGET, CVS HEALTH, Rio Tinto PLC and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Worrall, James Worrall, Chloe Worrall and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
