Cases 71 - 80 of 1,385
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. SOLERA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv20132
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
SOLERA, LLC, BHUPEN C. PATEL and ESTATE OF LEENA B. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Patel-Chludzinski v. Poole, Inc.
as 3:2023cv01494
Plaintiff:
Roshani Patel-Chludzinski
Defendant:
Poole, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Abramowski et al v. Nuvei Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00965
Plaintiff:
Pawneet Abramowski, Amanda Abrams, AG Mortgage Value Partners Master Fund, L.P. and others
Defendant:
Nuvei Corporation and Pinnacle Merger Sub, Inc.
Choice Hotels International , Inc. et al v. Jai Sai Baba, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03360
Petitioner:
Choice Hotels International, Inc. and Choice Hotels Owners Council
Respondent:
Jai Sai Baba LLC, Dipesh Patel and MDPD13 Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0207
Russell Scott Walker v. State of Delaware, et al
as 23-2513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUSSELL E. SCOTT WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF DELAWARE, CITY OF MILFORD, MILFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
USA v. Hiteshkumar Patel
as 23-2447
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HITESHKUMAR PATEL
Nita Patel v. USA
as 23-2418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NITA PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
