Cases 71 - 80 of 636
Raul Ramirez v. Warden Schuylkill FCI
as 22-2272
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAUL S. RAMIREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SCHUYLKILL FCI
Robert Ramirez v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 22-2189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT RAMIREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
ARROYO et al v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATION, INC.
as 2:2022cv04147
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ARROYO, RAYMOND BYERS, TAMMY MUHAMMAD-WHITESIDE and others
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Nichols et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Lydia Savaglio, Catharine Nichols, Lori Nolen and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ramirez v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
Abran Ramirez
Defendant:
PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc., PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramirez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00797
Plaintiff:
Modesto Ramirez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Ransom et al
as 1:2022cv00651
Petitioner:
Robert Ramirez
Respondent:
Kevin Ransom, George Little and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Sage
as 1:2022cv00638
Petitioner:
Raul S. Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden J. Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. David Ramirez
as 22-1656
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID JUSINO RAMIREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
