Cases 71 - 80 of 101
MCKEE v. MUSSER et al
as 2:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
DENNIS MCKEE
Defendant:
LORI MUSSER, CARL DECHELLIS and BEAVER COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROMIG v. BEAVER COUNTY, PA
as 2:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
DALE LAWRENCE ROMIG
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MALCOMB v. BEAVER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA (PROTHONATARY) et al
as 2:2013cv01772
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CLIFFORD MALCOMB
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA (PROTHONATARY), PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS (CENTRAL OFFICE), PA. BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
RETTER v. DOUGLAS et al
as 2:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS E. RETTER
Defendant:
GREGORY K. DOUGLAS, TERRY J. MITKO and THE COUNTY OF BEAVER, BEAVER COUNTY CIVIL AND CRIMINAL COURTS DIVISIONS, BEAVER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GROSS v. AMADIO et al
as 2:2012cv00709
Plaintiff:
NORMAN F. GROSS
Defendant:
TONY AMADIO, BOARD CF COMMISSIONERS, WILLIAM M. BRASLAWCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BRADLEY v. BEAVER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ET AL et al
as 1:2011cv00201
Petitioner:
ERNEST HOWARD BRADLEY
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ET AL, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL, ERIE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ET AL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
