Cases 71 - 80 of 279
Cannon v. Devine et al
as 1:2021cv01626
Plaintiff:
Jamarr Cannon
Defendant:
Corporal Beverly Devine and DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER v. PA DOC et al
as 2:2021cv05352
Plaintiff:
JAMES BAKER
Defendant:
PA DOC, SCI FAYETTE, SCI GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOONE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05362
Plaintiff:
LAMONT BOONE
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, PA. DOC PHX INMATE TRANSPORTATION and SCI-PHX MED/DEPT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DOC
as 2:2021cv01315
Petitioner:
M. S. MITCHELL
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DOC and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Forrest v. Wetzel, et al
as 21-2473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL FORREST
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, THERESA DELBALSO, Facility Manager, S.C.I. State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, B. MASON, Deputy of Eastern Regional PA DOC PRC program Review Committee and others
Macon v. Smokle et al
as 4:2021cv01247
Plaintiff:
James Macon
Defendant:
K. Smokle, Chaplin Sweeny, Zulkowis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Angelo Clark v. Robert Coupe, et al
as 21-2310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELO CLARK
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT COUPE, DOC Commissioner
POLYTEK DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. 'DOC' JOHNSON ENTERPRISES
as 5:2019cv05943
Defendant:
'DOC' JOHNSON ENTERPRISES
Plaintiff:
POLYTEK DEVELOPMENT CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MACON v. SMOKLE et al
as 2:2021cv02929
Defendant:
ZULKOWIS, SGT. SWEENY, DOC ASSIAAST MCCOWN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MACON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kehoe v. PA DOC Director of Food Services at Central Office et al
as 3:2021cv00929
Defendant:
Rev. Rainey, Rev. Klemm, Mr. Stuller and others
Plaintiff:
John Kehoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
